EXAMINING THE ROLE OF THE SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT IN INCREASING ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMIC ERA
الكلمات المفتاحية:
Economy Growthالملخص
Singapore's neo-classical economic model is a dynamic blend of state capitalism, urban planning, a thriving creative economy, well-crafted monetary policies, a robust welfare system, progressive education reforms, and effective fiscal strategies. Together, these components synergize to propel economic expansion, entice global talent, ensure political stability, and propel the digital revolution. This study delves into elucidating the pivotal role played by the Singaporean government in fostering digital economic evolution within the constructs of the neo-classical economic paradigm.
Utilizing a qualitative research approach with a focus on literature review, the findings underscore the centrality of the state in driving digital economic transformation within the neo-classical economic framework. Acting as a primary catalyst, the government enhances economic growth through strategic interventions in education, healthcare, human capital development, housing, and financial progress, steering state-owned enterprises and international commerce towards advancement.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Alekseenko. (2022). Legal Regulation of the use of Distributed Ledger Technologies in Financial Sector of Singapore. Revista De Investigaciones Universidad Del Quindío, 381-391.
Carter, J. R. (2006). An Empirical Note on Economic Freedom and Income Inequality. Publik Choice, 163-177.
Charleen Chiong, and Clive Dimmock. (2020). Building trust: how low-income parents navigate neoliberalism in singapore’s education system. Comparative Education, 394-408.
Chong, T. (2014). Vocational education in Singapore: meritocracy and hidden narratives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 637-648.
Eng Fong Pang, and Linda Y. C. Lim. (2015). Labor, productivity and Singapore's development model. Singapore Economic Review, 12-30.
Gopinathan, S. (1999). Preparing for the next rung: Economic restructuring and educational reform in Singapore. Journal of Education and Work, 295–308.
Huat, C. B. (2015). State-owned enterprises, state capitalism and social distribution in Singapore. The Pacific Review, 499-521.
Institute, F. (2023, September 19). Hong Kong drops from #1 rank for the first time in history; Singapore takes top spot (Siaran Pers). Retrieved from Fraser Institute: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/economic-freedom-of-the-world-2023- newsrelease-intl.pdf
Jane Kenway, and Aaron Koh. (2013). The elite school as ‘cognitive machine’ and ‘social paradise’: Developing transnational capitals for the national ‘field of power’. Journal of Sociology, 272- 290.
Lee, Mary (2020). dari. Ekonomi Asia Tenggara. Nanyang Technological University, Singapura,
Marc Philipp Schulze, and Jana Maria Kleibert. (2021). Transnational education for regional economic development? Understanding Malaysia's and Singapore's strategic coupling in global higher education. nternational Journal of Training and Development, 363-382.
S. M. Thangavelu, and Mun-Heng Toh. (2005). Bilateral ‘WTO-Plus’ Free Trade Agreements: The WTO Trade Policy Review of Singapore 2004. The World Economy, 211-1228.
Shatkin, G. (2013). Reinterpreting the Meaning of the ‘Singapore Model’: State Capitalism and Urban Planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 116-137.
Soo Ann Lee, and Jiwei Qian. (2017). The Evolving Singaporean Welfare State. Social Policy and Administration, 916-939. Wilson, P. (2015). Monetary policy and financial sector development. The Singapore Economic Review, 83-111.
Xiaoping Chen, and Yuchen Shao. (2017). Trade policies for a small open economy: the case of singapore. The World Economy, 2500-2511.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 Ridwan, K.P.Suharyono S. Hadiningrat
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
